Although they met at a young age, they both married other people – Camilla married Andrew Parker-Bowles, a retired military officer, but the pair divorced in 2005.
Charles married Princess Diana, the mother of Prince William and Prince Harry.
When Charles and Diana split, the Princess of Wales revealed there were “three people” in their marriage, in a bitter swipe at the pair.
After Diana’s death, the Charles and Camilla went public with their relationship, with Camilla attending a hunt with Charles, William and Harry.
The pair were first photographed together as a couple in January 1999 as they left the Ritz Hotel after celebrating a party for Camilla’s sister, Annabel.
Charles, 69, finally married Camilla, 70, in 2005, in a low key ceremony at Windsor Guildhall and Camilla was given an engagement ring that once belonged to his grandmother, Queen Elizabeth The Queen Mother.
The narrative included Diana talking openly about her romance and sexual coexistence with Charles, her agitated marriage and open life
She uncovered she met the Prince only 13 times before they wedded
Royal specialists cautioned yesterday that the program, going ahead best of endless other indications of the treacheries that conveyed the Royal family to emergency point in the 1990s, had harmed Charles and Camilla in this twentieth commemoration year of Diana’s passing
Whether the harm will armada or all the more longer enduring stays to be seen, they said
Royal specialists said a welter of material distributed over the late spring, including another memoir of Camilla by Penny Junor and other indications of the breakdown of Charles and Diana’s marriage, has recounted the story for another age excessively youthful, making it impossible to recall what happened 20 years prior – and presented to everything back for many Britons who saw it first time around
Sally Bedell Smith, whose account of the beneficiary to the honored position, Prince Charles: The Passions And Paradoxes Of An Improbable Life, was distributed not long ago, called attention to that Charles had purposely abstained from giving his side of the dramatization openly thus it remained an uneven story